Oh Wireless and Chong Oh v. Diego CantuAppeal from 192nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS; Opinion Filed November 12, 2013. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00180-CV OH WIRELESS AND CHONG OH, Appellants V. DIEGO CANTU, Appellee On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-05257 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O'Neill, Lang-Miers, and Evans Opinion by Justice Evans The clerk s record in this case is overdue. By letter dated July 15, 2013 we notified appellants that the Dallas County District Clerk s office had informed the Court that the clerk s record had not been filed because appellants had not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk s record. We directed appellants to provide the Court with written verification of payment or payment arrangements for the clerk s record within ten days. We cautioned appellants that if we did not receive the required documentation, we might dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellants have not provided the required documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the clerk s record. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). /David Evans/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE 130180F.P05 2 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT OH WIRELESS AND CHONG OH, Appellants No. 05-13-00180-CV On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-05257. Opinion delivered by Justice Evans. Justices O'Neill and Lang-Miers participating. V. DIEGO CANTU, Appellee In accordance with this Court s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee DIEGO CANTU recover his costs of this appeal from appellants OH WIRELESS AND CHONG OH. Judgment entered this 12th day of November, 2013. /David Evans/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE 130180.dis.cr.op.docx 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.