Steve Rouse v. Texas Capital Bank, N.A.--Appeal from 162nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County (opinion by chief justice wright)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Set aside in part, AFFIRM in part, REMAND; Opinion issued January 31, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00050-CV STEVE ROUSE, Appellant V. TEXAS CAPITAL BANK, N.A., Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-13003 OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Before the Court is the January 18, 2013 joint motion to set aside appealed part of judgment pursuant to settlement. In the motion, the parties state they have settled all claims between them. The parties also state, and our records show, that Tri-County Autoplex was a party in the trial court, but did not perfect an appeal. We grant the parties joint motion, and pursuant to the parties request, set aside without regard to the merits the portion of the judgment that awards damages and injunctive relief against Rouse, and remand that portion of the judgment to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 130050F.P05 2 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT Steve Rouse, Appellant No. 05-13-00050-CV On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-13003. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis participating. V. Texas Capital Bank, N.A., Appellee In accordance with this Court s opinion of this date, the portion of the judgment that awards damages and injunctive relief against Steve Rouse is SET ASIDE without regard to the merits. In all other respects, the trial court's judgment is AFFIRMED. We REMAND this cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment pursuant to the parties agreement. It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal. Judgment entered this January 31, 2013. /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
