Yada Smith v. Beneficial Texas, Inc. et al--Appeal from 101st Judicial District Court of Dallas County (opinion by chief justice wright)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS; Opinion Filed February 28, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01626-CV YADA SMITH, Appellant V. BENEFICIAL TEXAS, INC., BNC OF IRVINE, CA, EVERETT FINANCIAL, INC. D/B/A SUPREME LENDING, AND BENEFICIAL FINANCIAL, INC., Appellees On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11-9774-E OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis Opinion by Chief Justice Wright By letter dated December 5, 2012, the Court informed appellant that the $175 required filing fee was past due. We instructed appellant to pay the filing fee within ten days of the date of the letter and cautioned her that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). As of today s date, the required filing fee has not been paid. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 121626F.P05 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT YADA SMITH, Appellant No. 05-12-01626-CV On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11-9774-E. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis participating. V. BENEFICIAL TEXAS, INC., BNC OF IRVINE, CA, EVERETT FINANCIAL, INC. D/B/A SUPREME LENDING, AND BENEFICIAL FINANCIAL, INC., Appellees In accordance with this Court s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellees, BENEFICIAL TEXAS, INC., BNC OF IRVINE, CA, EVERETT FINANCIAL, INC. D/B/A SUPREME LENDING, AND BENEFICIAL FINANCIAL, INC., recover their costs of this appeal from appellant, YADA SMITH. Judgment entered February 28, 2013. /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.