In the Interest of T. L.R. and A.R.R., children v. --Appeal from 330th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (opinion by chief justice wright)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
1)ISNIISS; Opinion issued ,Januarv 29, 2013 0 In The QItntrt uf ppiat FiftI! Oitrirt uf rxui at laUa No. 05-12-01530-CV IN THE INTEREST OF T.L.R. AND A.R.R., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court Dallas County. Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09-12373 OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The clerk s record in this case is overdue. By letter dated November 26, 2012. we notified appellant that the Dallas County District Clerk had notilied the Court that the clerk s record had been prepared but had not been filed in this Court because appellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the record. We directed appellant to provide the Court, within ten days, written verification that appellant had either paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record. We cautioned appellant that failure to provide the required documentation within the time specified might result in dismissal of the appeal for of prosecution. To date. appellant has not provided the requested documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEx. R. App. P. 37.3(b) 42.3(b),(c) / / 121530F.P05 121 530.op.docx / (nurt uf ;\t1pra1i fift1! Jiitrirt uf rxi zü 1a11zis JUDGMENT In the Interest of T.L.R. and A.R.R., children, Appellant No. 05-12-01530-CV V. On Appeal from the 33 0th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09-12373. Opinion delivered h Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis participating. In accordance with this Court s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee Kara Rafferty recover her costs of this appeal from appellant Richard Rafferty. Judgment entered this January 29. 2013.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.