Crook, Ryan v. The State of TexasAppeal from Criminal District Court No. 4 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed September 30, 2013. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01310-CR RYAN EUGENE CROOK, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11-70359-K MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O Neill, Lang-Miers, and Evans Opinion by Justice O Neill Ryan Eugene Crook appeals from the adjudication of his guilt for assault involving family violence. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.01(a) (West 2011); TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. §§ 71.0021, 71.005 (West 2008 & Supp. 2012). The trial court assessed punishment at ten years imprisonment. On appeal, appellant s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court s judgment. /Michael J. O'Neill/ MICHAEL J. O NEILL JUSTICE Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 121310F.U05 -2- Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT RYAN EUGENE CROOK, Appellant No. 05-12-01310-CR Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F11-70359-K). Opinion delivered by Justice O Neill, Justices Lang-Miers and Evans participating. V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Based on the Court s opinion of this date, the trial court s judgment is AFFIRMED. Judgment entered September 30, 2013. /Michael J. O'Neill/ MICHAEL J. O NEILL JUSTICE -3-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
