Carvajal, Domingo Santino v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 256th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

_____ AFFIRM; and Opinion issued March i 2013. In The Qlourt of Ztppeat jfiftj itrtct of exa at aUa No. 05- 12-00733-CR I)OMINGO SANTINO CAR VA.JAL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court I)allas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. FlO-52736-R MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley. O Neill, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Lewis Domingo Santino Carvajal appeals from the revocation of his community supervision. The trial court convicted appellant of felony DWI and assessed punishment at ten years imprisonment. See TEx. PENAL CODE ANN. § 49.04(a), 49.09(b)(2) (West Supp. 2012). On appeal, appellant s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. C alifornia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. IPanel Op1 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, hut he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel s brief. Bledwe 1. State, 178 S.W.3d 24. 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate courts duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court s judgment. DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE Do Not Publish TEx. R. ApP. P.47 12073 3F1.J05 -2- Qtourt of ppeat jfiftb Oitrict of exa at afta JUDGMENT DOMINGO SANTINO CAR VAJAL. Appellant No, 05l2O0733CR V. Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court of Dallas County. Texas (Tr.CLNo. Fl 052736R). Opinion delivered by Justice Lewis, Justices Moseley and O Neill participating. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Based on the Court s opinion of this date. the trial court s judgment is AFFIRMED. Judgment entered March 1. 2013. J DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.