Pipkins, Keenan v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation--Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 of Dallas County (opinion by chief justice wright)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS; Opinion issued January 16, 2013. In The C!iourt of 1\ppenls ll.ifth, ilistrict of IDexns at ilnllns No. 05-12-00727 -CV KEENAN PIPKINS, Appellant v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-02649-B OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers and Justice Lewis Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Appellant's brief in this case is overdue. By order dated October 18, 2012, we granted appellant's second motion to extend time to file his brief and ordered appellant to file his brief by October 31, 2102. We cautioned appellant that no further extensions would be granted absent exceptional circumstances. By letter dated November 5, 2012, we notified appellant the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file his brief and an extension motion within ten days or the case would be dismissed. To date, appellant has not filed his brief, an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this ap~. See TEx. R. APP. P. 38.8(1), 42.3(c). 120727F.P05 2 -~ ·-----~--------~-----~-~----·-----· - -~--- - - - - -~- -- ~ -~- ------ Qrourt of Appeals lF.iftlf ilistrirl of Wexas at ilallits JUDGMENT Keenan Pipkins, Appellant No. 05-12-00727-CV V. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-02649-B. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis participating. In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation recover its costs of this appeal from appellant Keenan Pipkins. Judgment entered this 16th day of January, 2013.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
