Jackson IV, Simon v. Jackson, Jeanette--Appeal from 255th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (opinion by chief justice wright)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

I)ISMISS Opinion issued January 29, 2013 in The 1tnurt uf Apprzihi ifti! )itrirt nf £XLU Lit tlLt11LU No. 05-1 2-00706-CV SIMON JACKSON, IV, Appellant V. JEANETTE JACKSON, Appellee On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court Dallas County. Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-10-05677S OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis Opinion by Chief .Justice Wright By letter dated May 25, 2012 we notified appellant the $175 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to pay the filing fee within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal. Also by letter dated May 25, 2012, we notified appellant that a docketing statement had not been filed. We directed appellant to file a docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a docketing statement might result in dismissal of the appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee. filed a docketing statement, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEx. R. App. P. 42.3(b),(c). (. \ROI YN \\RI(H II (1 liii .JL S II( I 20706F.P05 Qtnirt ul ApTra1 fFttt1! Di!5trtrt uf Lixai ztt Ja1kui JUDGMENT Simon Jackson. IV. Appellant No. 05-12-00706..CV V. Jeanette Jackson. Appellee On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court. Dallas County. Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-1O-05677S. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis participating. In accordance with this Court s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee Jeanette Jackson recover her costs of this appeal from appellant Simon Jackson, IV. Judgment entered this January 29. 2013. \ROl.YN 1 C WR1(TlI f ( 1 111 i .11 S[ l( L

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.