Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company and Lance Goff v. The Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth, et al--Appeal from 101st Judicial District Court of Dallas County (opinion by chief justice wright)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS; Opinion issued January 16, 2013. In The Q!ourt of Appeals lf.ifth. ilistrid of IDexas at ilaUas~--- -- c. ยท No. 05-12-00673-CV PHILADELPIDA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY AND LANCE GOFF, Appellants v. THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH, ET AL, Appellee On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-15563-E OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers and Justice Lewis Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Appellants' brief in this case is overdue. By letter dated July 9, 2012, we notified appellants the time for filing their brief had expired. We directed appellants to file their brief and an extension motion within ten days or the appeal would be dismissed. To date, appellants have not filed their brief, an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEx. R. APP. P. 38.8(1), 42.3(c). 120673F.P05 Oinurt nf Appeals lF.ifth, ilistrirl nf <!Jexas at ilallas JUDGMENT Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company and Lance Goff, Appellants No. 05-12-00673-CV V. On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-15563-E. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis participating. The Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth, et al, Appellees In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellees The Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth, Bishop Jack Leo Iker, Franklin Salazar, JoAnn Patton, Walter Virden III, and St. Andrew's Episcopal Church recover their costs of this appeal from appellants Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company and Lance Goff. Judgment entered this 161h day of January, 2013.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
