Castillo, Carlos Ochoa v. The State of Texas--Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 6 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

~- -- ~-- --~- ·-- - -- ------ -'~·- --- --------- ------- ------------ Affirmed; Opinion Filed January 15, 2013. In The QCourt of ~peal~ jfiftb 1JBi~trirt of -m:exa~ at 1JBalla~ No. 05-11-01194-CR CARLOS OCHOA CASTILLO, Appellant v. ·THE STATE OFTEXAS, Appellee· On App~al from' the c:riminatD-istriCt' Court No.6~:.-'-· Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F09-5423i-X ,· · , · ,, ·' J MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Francis, and Lang Opinion by Justice Moseley A jury convicted Carlos Ochoa Castillo of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon, a firearm, and assessed punishment at seventy-five years' imprisonment. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 29.03(a)(2) (West 2011). On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807,811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy ofthe briefto appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a prose response, but he did not file a prose response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court's duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment. t .... : ¢ '.t·:· .. 1_1 ¢ ¢ -. . r: :.i:j..J Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P.47 111194F.U05 -2- QCourt of §ppealii jfiftb miiitrirt of 'lEexaii at mallaii JUDGMENT CARLOS OCHOA CASTILLO, Appellant No.OS-11-01194-CR V. Appeal from the Criminal District Court No.6 ofDallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F09-54232-X). Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Justices Francis and Lang participating. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Based on the Court's opinion ofthis date, the trial court's judgment is AFF_IRMED. ~. - -- : Judgment entered January 15,2013. : --_i

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.