IN RE PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND STEVE ADAMS, Relators

Writ of Mandamus Denied, Opinion issued December 7, 2010
 
 
 
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
............................
No. 05-10-01439-CV
............................
IN RE PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL
INSURANCE COMPANY AND STEVE ADAMS, Relators
 
.............................................................
Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 1
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CC-10-02190-A
.............................................................
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Morris, Lang, and Myers
Opinion by Justice Lang
 
        Relators contend the trial court erred in denying their motion to abate. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992). Additionally, relators' petition does not satisfy the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(j); In re Butler, 270 S.W.3d 757, 758 (Tex. App.-Dallas 2008, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relators' petition for writ of mandamus.
                                                          
                                                          DOUGLAS S. LANG
                                                          JUSTICE
 
101439F.P05