SHERRY XIAOHUA XING, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Annotate this Case

DISMISS; Opinion Filed November 9, 2010.
 
 
 
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
............................
No. 05-10-00993-CR
............................
SHERRY XIAOHUA XING, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
.............................................................
On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F05-44083-U
.............................................................
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Lang
Opinion by Justice Lang
 
        Sherry Xiaohua Xing was convicted of injury to a child fourteen years of age or younger. Punishment following the revocation of appellant's community supervision was assessed at ten years' imprisonment. Appellant filed a notice of appeal after she was sentenced. The Court now has before it appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal because the trial court granted her motion for new trial. Attached to the motion is a copy of the trial court's order granting the motion for new trial and the trial court's judgment ruling appellant incompetent to stand trial and ordering in-patient mental health services.
        An order granting a motion for new trial restores a case to its position before the former trial, and there is no longer a judgment in place, leaving us without jurisdiction over the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 21.9(b); Waller v. State, 931 S.W.2d 640, 643-44 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1996, no pet.). Accordingly, we grant the October 18, 2010 motion to dismiss the appeal.
        We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
 
 
                                                          
                                                          DOUGLAS S. LANG
                                                          JUSTICE
 
Do Not Publish
Tex. R. App. P. 47
100993F.U05
 
 
 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.