STEVE COPLING, TOMMY WALTERS, AND KEN MACKENZIE, Appellants v. CHARLES KENNETH SKEES, SR. AND CHARLES KENNETH SKEES, JR., Appellees
Annotate this CaseDISMISS; Opinion Filed November 30, 2009.
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
............................
No. 05-09-00770-CV
............................
STEVE COPLING, TOMMY WALTERS, AND KEN MACKENZIE, Appellants
V.
CHARLES KENNETH SKEES, SR. AND CHARLES KENNETH SKEES, JR., Appellees
.............................................................
On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 08-12106
.............................................................
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Moseley, FitzGerald, and Lang-Miers
The Court has before it appellants' November 9, 2009 motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellants state that appellees will be filing dismissal notices in the trial court, which will render the appeal moot. Appellants ask that we dismiss the appeal so that the trial court may complete the dismissal process. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).
PER CURIAM
090770F.P05
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.