MARK ANTHONY MANRIQUEZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Annotate this Case

AFFIRMED as MODIFIED; Opinion Filed June 23, 2008.
 
 
 
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
............................
No. 05-07-00871-CR
............................
MARK ANTHONY MANRIQUEZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
.............................................................
On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court
Rockwall County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2-06-347
.............................................................
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Wright and Francis
Opinion By Chief Justice Thomas
        A jury convicted Mark Anthony Manriquez of felony driving while intoxicated (DWI) and assessed punishment at six years' imprisonment and a $3000 fine. In three issues, appellant contends the evidence is legally and factually insufficient and the judgment is void because the judgment reflects the offense occurred on an impossible date. We affirm the trial court's judgment as modified.
        Appellant argues the trial court's judgment is void because it reflects the offense occurred on June 3, 3006, an impossible date, and there is no evidence the offense occurred on that date. The State responds the incorrect date on the judgment does not render it void or the evidence insufficient. We agree with the State. Appellant was indicted for DWI that occurred on June 3, 2006, the evidence presented showed the offense occurred on that date, and the jury was charged that the offense occurred on June 3, 2006.
        The trial court's judgment incorrectly states the date of the offense as “June 3, 3006.” Clerical errors in judgments are subject to being corrected. See English v. State, 592 S.W.2d 949, 955-56 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980); Smith v. State, 801 S.W.2d 629, 633 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1991, no pet.). Accordingly, we modify the trial court's judgment to show the date of the offense was June 3, 2006. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529-30 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1991, pet. ref'd).
        As modified, we affirm the trial court's judgment.
 
 
 
                                                          
                                                          LINDA THOMAS
                                                          CHIEF JUSTICE
 
Do Not Publish
Tex. R. App. P. 47
070871F.U05
 
 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.