MARTIN CHAVEZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Annotate this Case

AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed September 10, 2007.
 
 
 
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
............................
No. 05-06-00481-CR
............................
MARTIN CHAVEZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
.............................................................
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. F04-54528-MH
.............................................................
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Moseley, O'Neill, and FitzGerald
        Martin Chavez waived a jury and pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated, third offense. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the trial court assessed punishment at ten years' imprisonment, probated for five years, and a $2000 fine. The State later moved to revoke appellant's community supervision, alleging he committed a new offense. The trial court found the allegation true, revoked appellant's community supervision, and assessed punishment at ten years' imprisonment and a $2000 fine.
        Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response.
        We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.
        We affirm the trial court's judgment in each case.
 
                                                          
                                                          PER CURIAM
 
Do Not Publish
Tex. R. App. P. 47
060481f.u05
 
 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.