Holston Banks, Jr., Priscilla Smith, Bernadette Young, Tyrone Banks, Timothy Banks, and Belinda Gail Scott v. City of Big Spring, Texas and Darnell Construction, LLC Appeal from 118th District Court of Howard County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion filed July 19, 2018 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-17-00223-CV __________ HOLSTON BANKS, JR., PRISCILLA SMITH, BERNADETTE YOUNG, TYRONE BANKS, TIMOTHY BANKS, AND BELINDA GAIL SCOTT, Appellants V. CITY OF BIG SPRING, TEXAS AND DARNELL CONSTRUCTION, LLC, Appellees On Appeal from the 118th District Court Howard County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 50329 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellants’ brief was originally due to be filed in this court on or before January 11, 2018. After receiving three extensions of time in which to file the brief, Appellants’ counsel was permitted to withdraw despite the objections of his clients. Upon counsel’s withdrawal, this court notified Appellants that their brief was due to be filed on or before May 14, 2018. We subsequently notified Appellants that their brief was past due and extended the deadline to June 14, 2018. On June 25, 2018, the clerk of this again notified Appellants that their brief was past due. In the June 25 letter, this court extended the deadline to July 5, 2018, and informed Appellants that the failure to timely file their brief by the July 5 due date “may result in dismissal of the appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b). As of this date, Appellants have not filed a brief, nor have they requested any further extensions of time in which to file their brief. Based upon Appellants’ failure to prosecute this appeal in a timely manner, we conclude that this appeal should be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. PER CURIAM July 19, 2018 Panel consists of: Willson, J., Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1 1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas, sitting by assignment. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.