Cobalt Operating, LLC; Cobalt Operating; Blue Ridge Resources, LLC; Crosstex Services, LLC; and Mark Burkett v. Arismendez Construction, LLC Appeal from 106th District Court of Dawson County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion filed January 6, 2017 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________ No. 11-16-00295-CV ___________ COBALT OPERATING, LLC; COBALT OPERATING; BLUE RIDGE RESOURCES, LLC; CROSSTEX SERVICES, LLC; AND MARK BURKETT, Appellants V. ARISMENDEZ CONSTRUCTION, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 106th District Court Dawson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 15-11-19697 MEMORANDUM OPINION The parties have filed in this court a joint motion to affirm in part, modify in part, and remand. In the motion, the parties state that they have reached a settlement, and they ask that we grant the relief requested in their joint motion in order to effectuate their settlement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). The motion indicates that the parties have agreed to the following: [1] The appeal of the Final Summary Judgment as against Cobalt Operating LLC shall be and hereby is withdrawn, and such portion of the Final Summary Judgment shall be affirmed and become final and non-appealable. [2] The Final Summary Judgment as against the remaining Appellants: Cobalt Operating, Crosstex Services, LLC, Blue Ridge Resources, LLC, and Mark Burkett, shall be vacated, and a takenothing judgment shall be entered in favor of such Appellants and against Appellee Arismendez. [3] Following the above modifications to the Final Summary Judgment, this case shall be remanded to the 106th Judicial District Court. We grant the parties’ joint motion. As requested in the motion, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed insofar as it relates to Appellant Cobalt Operating, LLC; the judgment of the trial court is vacated insofar as it relates to the remaining Appellants and is modified to reflect a take-nothing judgment in their favor; and the cause is remanded to the trial court. PER CURIAM January 6, 2017 Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J., and Bailey, J. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
