In the interest of W.L.D. and D.T.D., childrenAppeal from 91st District Court of Eastland County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion filed May 15, 2014 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________ No. 11-14-00111-CV ___________ IN THE INTEREST OF W.L.D. AND D.T.D., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 91st District Court Eastland County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV-11-42,439 MEMORANDUM OPINION Kelli Sue Bouget, Appellant, has filed a notice of appeal from an order holding her in contempt for failing to comply with a previous order of the trial court regarding the possession of her children. Upon filing the appeal, the clerk of this court notified Appellant by letter that it did not appear this court had jurisdiction to entertain her direct appeal from an order of contempt. We requested that Appellant respond by May 5, 2014, and show grounds to continue the appeal. Appellant has not filed a response addressing the jurisdictional issue. We dismiss the appeal. A judgment of contempt is not appealable on direct appeal. Tex. Animal Health Comm n v. Nunley, 647 S.W.2d 951, 952 (Tex. 1983); In re Smith, 310 S.W.3d 908, 913 (Tex. App. Eastland 2010, orig. proceeding); Tracy v. Tracy, 219 S.W.3d 527, 530 (Tex. App. Dallas 2007, no pet.). The only available means of review from an order of contempt are writs of mandamus and writs of habeas corpus. In re Long, 984 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. 1999) (orig. proceeding). Because this is a direct appeal from a contempt order, we have no jurisdiction. Accordingly, we must dismiss this appeal. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM May 15, 2014 Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J., and Bailey, J. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
