Michelle Dimmitt v. Brookshire Grocery Company d/b/a Brookshire's and Superior Sanitation, Inc.Appeal from 220th District Court of Comanche County (concurring and dissenting memorandum opinion )

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Opinion filed June 26, 2014 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-12-00129-CV __________ MICHELLE DIMMITT, Appellant V. BROOKSHIRE GROCERY COMPANY D/B/A BROOKSHIRE S AND SUPERIOR SANITATION, INC., Appellees On Appeal from the 220th District Court Comanche County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CCCV-10-14910 CONCURRING MEMORANDUM OPINION A wet floor is a wet floor. Insofar as the majority holds that the wet floor cone did not adequately warn of a different kind of wet floor, I disagree. However, because I believe that the summary judgment evidence raises an issue of material fact as to whether the cone was in sufficient proximity to the place where Dimmitt fell so as to constitute an adequate warning, I concur in the result. June 26, 2014 MIKE WILLSON Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J., and Bailey, J. JUSTICE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.