Dontavis Gowan v. The State of TexasAppeal from 54th District Court of McLennan County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion filed October 17, 2013 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-12-00292-CR __________ DONTAVIS GOWAN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011-1805-C2 MEMORAND UM OPI NI ON Dontavis Gowan originally pleaded guilty to the offense of possession of cocaine, and the trial court deferred the adjudication of Gowan s guilt and placed him on community supervision for four years pursuant to the terms of a plea bargain. The State subsequently filed a motion to adjudicate guilt. Upon Gowan s plea of true to the motion to adjudicate, the trial court adjudicated his guilt and assessed his punishment at confinement in a state jail facility for twenty-four months and a fine of $1,000. The judgment nunc pro tunc reflects that the trial court also assessed court costs of $966 and Restitution of $140. We affirm. Issues Gowan presents nine issues for review. In the first three issues, Gowan complains of the trial court s assessment of restitution in the amount of $140 to the DPS Lab because it was not orally pronounced as part of the sentence, was not authorized, and was not supported by sufficient evidence. In his fourth issue, Gowan complains of the trial court s assessment of an intoxication/drug fee of $60 and a time payment fee of $25 as court costs because these fees were not compensatory and were not included in the sentence orally pronounced by the trial court in open court. 1 In his fifth issue, Gowan complains that the bill of costs was not signed. In his sixth issue, Gowan challenges the assessment of attorney s fees associated with the adjudication of his guilt. In the seventh and eighth issues, he challenges the assessment of attorney s fees associated with the initial plea and deferred adjudication. In his final issue, Gowan complains that the Time Credited as shown in the judgment is inaccurate. Complaints Procedurally Defaulted In light of a recent opinion by the Court of Criminal Appeals, we hold that Gowan has forfeited his right to complain on appeal of the matters raised in his first, second, third, fourth, seventh, and eighth issues. See Wiley v. State, No. PD1728-12, 2013 WL 5337093 (Tex. Crim. App. Sept. 25, 2013). In Wiley, a unanimous court held that the defendant, by procedural default, forfeited his right 1 We note that the State originally filed a letter brief conceding that Gowan s points regarding fees and restitution are well taken and stating that the proper remedy is to delete the DPS lab fee, the time payment fee, and the intoxication/drug fee. The State subsequently recanted its concessions and now urges that the $140 DPS charge for drug testing constitutes reparations, not restitution ; that the $60 intoxication/drug fee and the $25 time payment fee were mandatory under the law; and that the attorney s fees assessed as costs of court at the time Gowan was placed on community supervision may not be raised in this appeal. 2 to complain of attorney s fees that were included as court costs in both the original order placing the defendant on community supervision and in the judgment revoking his community supervision because he did not raise his complaint in a direct appeal from the original order. Id. The record in this case shows that the $140 Restitution to the DPS lab was specifically included in the order deferring adjudication, as were court costs in the amount of $911. The court costs of $911 included charges of $400 for courtappointed attorney s fees, $60 for the intoxication/drug fee, and $25 for the time payment fee. Following the court s ruling in Wiley, we hold that, by failing to appeal from the trial court s order deferring the adjudication of guilt, Gowan has forfeited his complaints regarding the costs, fees, and restitution that were included in that order; Gowan cannot raise these complaints in an appeal from the subsequent judgment adjudicating his guilt. Gowan s first, second, third, fourth, seventh, and eighth issues are overruled. Complaints Now Moot In his fifth issue, Gowan asserts, alternatively, that the trial court erred in assessing any court costs at all because the bill of costs was not signed. The supplemental clerk s record contains a bill of costs signed by the McLennan County District Clerk. Gowan s fifth issue is overruled. In his sixth issue, Gowan complains of the trial court s inclusion of his court-appointed attorney s fees as court costs to be paid by Gowan, an indigent defendant. This issue relates to the attorney s fees incurred for the revocation and adjudication only. See Mayer v. State, 309 S.W.3d 552, 555 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). Gowan s complaint in this issue has been rendered moot by the judgment nunc pro tunc that was entered after Gowan filed his brief. The original judgment of adjudication reflected court costs of $1,466, including attorney s fees of $900; the judgment nunc pro tunc reflects court costs of only $966. Upon the entry of the 3 judgment nunc pro tunc, the district clerk amended her bill of costs to reflect a credit of $500 and to reflect that the attorney s fees previously assessed for the revocation and adjudication proceeding were no longer due. 2 Because the sixth issue relates to an error that has been corrected by the trial court s judgment nunc pro tunc, Gowan s complaint is moot. The sixth issue is, therefore, overruled. Time Credited In his final issue, Gowan complains that he was not given credit for time spent in jail prior to the revocation of his guilt. We disagree. The trial court gave Gowan the appropriate credit for his time served. The first page of the judgment and the judgment nunc pro tunc set out the following dates that Gowan spent in jail as Time Credited: from May 15, 2011, to May 16, 2011; September 1, 2011; from November 28, 2011, to January 18, 2012; and from August 8, 2012, to August 30, 2012 (the date of adjudication). Furthermore, on the second page of the judgments, the trial court ordered that Gowan be given credit noted above on this sentence for the time spent incarcerated. Gowan s ninth issue is overruled. This Court s Ruling We affirm the judgment of the trial court. October 17, 2013 TERRY McCALL Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). JUSTICE Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Willson, J. 2 The remaining $400 assessment for attorney s fees stemmed from the initial plea and deferral and was addressed in the seventh and eighth issues. 4
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
