Emily Livingston Scown and Barbara Scown v. The City of Alpine, Texas Appeal from 394th District Court of Brewster County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § EMILY LIVINGSTON SCOWN AND BARBARA SCOWN, No. 08-16-00301-CV § Appeal from Appellants, § 394th District Court v. § THE CITY OF ALPINE, TEXAS, § of Brewster County, Texas (TC # 2015-03-B0705-CV) Appellee. § MEMORANDUM OPINION This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellants, Emily Livingston Scown and Barbara Scown, have failed to file their brief or a motion for extension of time to file the brief, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. The Clerk of the Court notified Appellants that their brief was past due and no motion for extension of time had been filed. The letter advised Appellants that the Court intended to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless Appellants responded within ten days and showed grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellants have not filed the brief or an extension motion, and they have not filed any response to the Court’s inquiry. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c). March 14, 2017 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.