In Re: Harold W. Mitchell--Appeal from of County (majority)

Annotate this Case


COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

 

 

 

IN RE: HAROLD W. MITCHELL,

 

RELATOR.

§

 

§

 

§

 

§

No. 08-12-00021-CR

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

 

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF

 

MANDAMUS

 

 

 

 

 

MEMORANDUM  OPINION

 

Relator Harold Mitchell, pro se, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, requesting that this Court compel the Honorable Bill McCoy, judge of the 358th Judicial District Court of Ector County to withdraw that part of its judgment which ordered Relator to reimburse the state for attorney's fees and costs related to his criminal conviction.  Section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code expressly limits the mandamus jurisdiction of the courts of appeals to (1) a writ necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the court, (2) a writ against a district court judge or county court judge in the court of appeals' district, or (3) a writ against a judge of a district court who is acting as a magistrate at a court of inquiry in the court of appeals district.  Tex.Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(a), (b)(West 2004).  Because the petition for writ of mandamus is not directed against a district court judge or county court judge in our district, and issuance of the writ is not necessary to enforce our jurisdiction, we do not have jurisdiction of this original proceeding.  Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

 

 

February 29, 2012

                                                                        CHRISTOPHER ANTCLIFF, Justice

 

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.

 

(Do Not Publish)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.