Salvador Gutierrez v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 171st District Court of El Paso County

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS SALVADOR GUTIERREZ, § No. 08-07-00348-CR Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § 171st District Court THE STATE OF TEXAS, § of El Paso County, Texas Appellee. § (TC# 20070D02093) § MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Salvador Gutierrez attempts to appeal from his conviction for the offense of aggravated robbery. Punishment was assessed at seven years imprisonment in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. We find that Appellant has not complied with Rule 25.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and we dismiss the appeal. Rule 25.2(a)(2) governs the defendant s right to appeal in a criminal case and requires that the trial court enter a certification of the defendant s right of appeal in every case in which it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order. TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2. Likewise, Rule 25.2(d) requires that the trial court certify whether the defendant has a right of appeal under Rule 25.2(a)(2). TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). An appellate court is required to dismiss an appeal if a certification that shows the defendant s right of appeal has not been made part of the appellate record. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal, but the record does not include the trial court s certification of the defendant s right to appeal as required by Rules 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2(d). The Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that a certification had not been filed and requested that Appellant file the certification within thirty days; otherwise, the appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d). Appellant has not responded to our request. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. KENNETH R. CARR, Justice April 10, 2008 Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Carr, JJ. (Do Not Publish) 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.