John B. Walton, Jr./ Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P. v. Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P./ John B. Walton, Jr.--Appeal from 109th District Court of Winkler County

Annotate this Case
Form: Dismiss TRAP 42.2 Appellant's Motion /**/

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

 

JOHN B. WALTON, JR. / HOOVER, BAX & SLOVACEK, L.L.P.,

 

Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

 

v.

 

HOOVER, BAX & SLOVACEK, L.L.P. / JOHN B. WALTON, JR.,

 

Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

 

 

 

 

No. 08-03-00366-CV

 

Appeal from the

 

109th Judicial District Court,

 

Winkler County, Texas

 

TC# 13,201-A

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Pending before the Court is a joint motion filed pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 42.1 and 43.2 to vacate the judgments of this Court and the trial court and to dismiss the underlying cause as moot due to settlement.

On October 14, 2004, we issued our opinion and judgment in this case. Walton v. Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P., 149 S.W.3d 834 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2004, pet. granted). The Supreme Court granted Hoover Slovacek s petition for review and on November 3, 2006 issued its decision affirming in part and reversing in part. Hoover Slovacek L.L.P. v. Walton, 206 S.W.3d 557 (Tex. 2006). The Supreme Court remanded the cause for consideration of certain issues which were not previously addressed.

After the Supreme Court issued its mandate, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss requesting that we vacate the judgments of this Court and the trial court and dismiss the underlying cause as moot. That motion is granted. Accordingly, the judgment of this Court, as modified by the Supreme Court, and the judgment of the district court are vacated and the underlying cause is dismissed. Pursuant to Rule 42.1(c), our opinion issued on October 14, 2004 is not withdrawn. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(c).

 

February 8, 2007

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

 

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Carr, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.