Patricia Clinton v. Marvin Clinton--Appeal from 298th District Court of Dallas County

Annotate this Case
/**/

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

 

PATRICIA CLINTON,

 

Appellant,

 

v.

 

MARVIN CLINTON,

 

Appellee.

 

 

 

 

No. 08-06-00158-CV

 

Appeal from the

 

298th District Court

 

of Dallas County, Texas

 

(TC# 05-033368-H)

 

O P I N I O N

 

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be dismissed pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), which states:

(b) If No Clerk s Record Filed Due to Appellant s Fault. If the trial court clerk failed to file the clerk s record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk s fee for preparing the clerk s record, the appellate court may--on a party s motion or its own initiative--dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. The court must give the appellant a reasonable opportunity to cure before dismissal.

 

By a letter dated June 28, 2006, this Court s clerk informed Appellant that no clerk s record had been filed and of the Court s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), absent a response from any party within ten days to show grounds for continuing the appeal. No response has been received as of this date.

We have given notice of our intent to dismiss the appeal, requested a response if a reasonable basis for failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk s fee for preparing the clerk s record exists, and have received none. We see no purpose that would be served by declining to dismiss this appeal at this stage of the proceedings. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), we dismiss the appeal. Appellee s Motion to Dismiss the Appeal is denied as moot.

RICHARD BARAJAS, Chief Justice

July 27, 2006

 

Before Barajas, C.J., McClure, and Chew, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.