In Re: Leonard Leon Nance--Appeal from of County
Annotate this CaseCOURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
)
)
) No. 08-05-00320-CR
)
IN RE: LEONARD LEON NANCE ) AN ORIGINAL
)
) PROCEEDING IN MANDAMUS
)
)
O P I N I O N
Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that the trial court has failed to act on his post-conviction petition for writ of habeas corpus. This Court does not have jurisdiction over matters related to post-conviction writs of habeas corpus. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). The Court of Criminal Appeals has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus when the trial court fails to act on a petition for writ of habeas corpus. See, e.g., Martin v. Hamlin, 25 S.W.3d 718, 719 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000); McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex.Crim.App. 1992).
The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
October 27, 2005
DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice
Before Barajas, C.J., McClure, and Chew, JJ.
(Do Not Publish)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
