Danny Pedregon v. Cynthia Sanchez--Appeal from 383rd District Court of El Paso County

Annotate this Case
Becker v. State /**/

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

 

)

DANNY PEDREGON, ) No. 08-05-00236-CV

)

Appellant, ) Appeal from

)

v. ) 383rd District Court

)

CYNTHIA PEDREGON, ) of El Paso County, Texas

)

Appellee. ) (TC# 91-14454)

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Danny Pedregon, Appellant, attempts to appeal from an order holding him in contempt for failure to pay child support, granting judgment for arrearages and suspending commitment. Appellant has also filed a separate notice of appeal from an order in a suit to modify which we have docketed under a separate number (08-05-00237-CV). We dismiss the instant appeal for want of jurisdiction.

This Court does not have jurisdiction to review contempt orders by direct appeal. Norman v. Norman, 692 S.W.2d 655, 655 (Tex. 1985). Contempt orders may only be reviewed by an application for a writ of habeas corpus, if the contemnor has been confined, or by a petition for a writ of mandamus, if the contemnor has not been confined. See Rosser v. Squier, 902 S.W.2d 962, 962 (Tex. 1995); Ex parte Williams, 690 S.W.2d 243, 243 (Tex. 1985).

Under the notice of appeal filed in cause number 08-05-00236-CV, Appellant attempts to appeal the order holding Appellant in contempt as well as the portion of the order granting judgment for arrearages and suspending the commitment. The portion of the order holding Appellant in contempt and suspending commitment is not appealable, but the portion of the order granting judgment for arrearages is appealable. Appellant has also filed a notice of appeal in cause number 08-05-00237-CV from an appealable modification order. Rather than maintaining two separate appeals, we dismiss cause number 08-05-00236-CV with the understanding that Appellant will be permitted to raise the arrearage issue in cause number 08-0500237-CV.

 

October 13, 2005

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

 

Before Barajas, C.J., McClure, and Chew, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.