Ronald Goodner v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 283rd District Court of Dallas County

Annotate this Case
Criminal Case Template /**/

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

 

RONALD GOODNER,

 

Appellant,

 

v.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 

Appellee.

 

 

 

 

No. 08-05-00019-CR

 

Appeal from the

 

283rd District Court

 

of Dallas County, Texas

 

(TC# F-0072671-LT)

 

O P I N I O N

 

This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of robbery. Appellant pleaded guilty and the court assessed punishment at five years deferred adjudication. The State filed a motion to adjudicate guilt. At the hearing on the motion to adjudicate guilt, Appellant entered a plea of true and the court adjudicated Appellant guilty of the offense of robbery. Appellant was sentenced to five years imprisonment. We affirm.

Appellant s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which he has concluded that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S. Ct. 2094, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1377 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel s brief has been delivered to Appellant, and Appellant has been advised of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel s brief and agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. A discussion of the matters discussed in counsel s brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.

The judgment is affirmed.

RICHARD BARAJAS, Chief Justice

August 25, 2005

 

Before Barajas, C.J., McClure, and Chew, JJ.

 

(Do Not Publish)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.