Juan Pablo Monticelli and Border Belt Company, Inc./Charles Hardtke, Inc., Charles L. Hardtke, Roger Zimmerman, Ind., Jointly and Severally v. Charles Hardtke, Inc., Charles L. Hardtke, Roger Zimmerman, Ind., Jointly and Severally/Juan Pablo Monticelli and Border Belt Company, Inc.--Appeal from 327th District Court of El Paso County
Annotate this CaseCOURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
JUAN PABLO MONTICELLI AND BORDER BELT COMPANY, INC./CHARLES HARDTKE, INC., CHARLES L. HARDTKE, AND
ROGER ZIMMERMAN,
Appellants,
v.
CHARLES HARDTKE, INC., CHARLES L. HARDTKE, ROGER ZIMMERMAN/JUAN PABLO MONTICELLI AND BORDER BELT COMPANY, INC.,
Appellees.
No. 08-02-00339-CV
Appeal from the
327th Judicial District Court
of El Paso County, Texas
(TC#2000-1787)
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Pending before the Court is the joint motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), which states:
(a) On Motion or By Agreement. The appellate court may dispose of an appeal as follows:
(1) On Motion of Appellant. In accordance with a motion of appellant, the court may dismiss the appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order unless disposition would prevent a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled.
. . .
The parties have complied with the requirements of Rule 42.1(a)(1). The Court has considered this cause on the joint motion and concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed. We therefore dismiss the appeal.
December 29, 2003
_______________________________________
RICHARD BARAJAS, Chief Justice
Before Panel No. 4
Barajas, C.J., Larsen, and McClure, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.