Order concerning Hooker vs. Thomson dated 11 July, 1996

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE STATE OF TENNESSEE, ex rel. JOHN JAY HOOKER, Appellant, v. BROOK THOMPSON, et al., Appellees, STATE OF TENNESSEE, ex rel. LEWIS LASKA, Appellant, v. BROOK THOMPSON, et al., Appellees, STATE OF TENNESSEE, ex rel. LEWIS LASKA, Appellant, v. BROOK THOMPSON, et al., Appellees. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 01A01-9606-CH-00259 No. 01A01-9606-CH-00280 No. 01S01-9606-CH-00114 ____________________________________________________________________ ORDER ____________________________________________________________________ These cases are before the Court upon a Motion for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Brief filed by Victor S. Johnson, III, District Attorney General for the Twentieth Judicial District, and Appellant John Jay Hooker's Supplemental Petition to Rehear. The Court having considered these matters, it is ORDERED: 1. The Motion for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Brief is DENIED. 2. Appellant John Jay Hooker's Supplemental Petition to Rehear is DENIED. 113552-1 ENTERED this 11th day of July, 1996. ________________________________________ WILLIAM H. D. FONES, CHIEF JUSTICE ________________________________________ MARTHA S. L. BLACK, JUSTICE _______________________________________ LIN S. HOWARD, JUSTICE _____________________________________ A. C. WHARTON, JR., JUSTICE _________________________________ S. MORRIS HADDEN, JUSTICE 113552-1 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.