Christopher Lewis v. State of Tennessee (Concurring)

Annotate this Case

Court Description:

Authoring Judge: Judge Timothy L. Easter

Trial Court Judge: Judge David A. Patterson

I unenthusiastically agree with the conclusion reached by the majority. The legal soundness and logical result reached by the post-conviction court effectively delivers a wound to Petitioner by the hand of his out-of-state post-conviction attorney. Such a wound is a mortal shot to Petitioner s chances of post-conviction review.

Download PDF

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 21, 2016 CHRISTOPHER LEWIS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County No. 100875 David A. Patterson, Judge ___________________________________ No. M2015-01198-CCA-R3-PC – Filed October 31, 2016 ___________________________________ TIMOTHY L. EASTER, J., concurring. I unenthusiastically agree with the conclusion reached by the majority. The legal soundness and logical result reached by the post-conviction court effectively delivers a wound to Petitioner by the hand of his out-of-state post-conviction attorney. Such a wound is a mortal shot to Petitioner’s chances of post-conviction review. I write separately to clearly state that, in my view, the post-conviction court was true to the law and its clear meaning. “Shall” means “shall.” See T.C.A. § 40-30-104(e); Tenn. Sup. Ct. R. 28 §5(E)(2) & §6(C)(3)(4). The post-conviction court understood this directive and so do I. However, weighing post-conviction counsel’s misfire against the injustice to Petitioner, Petitioner should be allowed to reload and try again. ____________________________________ TIMOTHY L. EASTER, JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.