State of Tennessee v. Susan Renee Bise (Concurring)

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Judge Glenn, Judge Woodall, and I all agree that the trial court inappropriately applied a single enhancement factor when considering the defendant s sentence. I write separately because each of us has different opinions as to what process should be used in determining the end result in circumstances in which the trial court inappropriately applied a single enhancing factor. Because I believe the trial judge is closer to the case, I would prefer to remand this case to the trial court for resentencing. I do not have that option as a result of my other two colleagues decisions. Therefore, with the trial court not having a presumption of correctness, I have reviewed the case de novo and, after giving consideration to the principles of sentencing, have concluded that the defendant s appropriate sentence is two years. The result that I reached is the same reached by Judge Glenn s opinion announcing the decision of the court. However, I think Judge Woodall has expressed appropriate concerns about the language contained in that opinion.

Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 30, 2011 STATE OF TENNESSEE V. SUSAN RENEE BISE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Greene County No. 09-CR-353 John F. Dugger, Jr., Judge No. E2011-00005-CCA-R3-CD - Filed September 15, 2011 J OHN E VERETT W ILLIAMS, J., concurring in results only. Judge Glenn, Judge Woodall, and I all agree that the trial court inappropriately applied a single enhancement factor when considering the defendant s sentence. I write separately because each of us has different opinions as to what process should be used in determining the end result in circumstances in which the trial court inappropriately applied a single enhancing factor. Because I believe the trial judge is closer to the case, I would prefer to remand this case to the trial court for resentencing. I do not have that option as a result of my other two colleagues decisions. Therefore, with the trial court not having a presumption of correctness, I have reviewed the case de novo and, after giving consideration to the principles of sentencing, have concluded that the defendant s appropriate sentence is two years. The result that I reached is the same reached by Judge Glenn s opinion announcing the decision of the court. However, I think Judge Woodall has expressed appropriate concerns about the language contained in that opinion. _________________________________ JOHN EVERETT WILLIAMS, JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.