In Re Justice H., Et Al.

Annotate this Case

Court Description:

Authoring Judge: Chief Judge D. Michael Swiney

Trial Court Judge: Judge G. Andrew Brigham

This appeal concerns the termination of two parents parental rights. The Tennessee Department of Children s Services ( DCS ) filed a petition in the Juvenile Court for Stewart County ( the Juvenile Court ) seeking to terminate the parental rights of Joshua H. ( Father ) and Amie H. ( Mother ) to their minor children Justice and Alijah ( the Children, collectively). After a trial, the Juvenile Court found the ground of severe abuse with respect to both parents. The Juvenile Court also found that termination of Mother s and Father s parental rights is in the Children s best interest. Mother and Father appeal to this Court. Neither parent contests grounds for termination, but both parents challenge the Juvenile Court s finding that termination of their parental rights is in the Children s best interest. We find by clear and convincing evidence, as did the Juvenile Court, that termination of Mother s and Father s parental rights is in the Children s best interest. We affirm the judgment of the Juvenile Court.

Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE 05/04/2018 Assigned on Briefs April 3, 2018 IN RE JUSTICE H., ET AL. Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Stewart County No. 7294 G. Andrew Brigham, Judge No. M2017-01870-COA-R3-PT JUDGMENT This appeal came on to be heard upon the record of the Juvenile Court of Stewart County and briefs filed on behalf of the respective parties. This Court is of the opinion that the Juvenile Court of Stewart County’s judgment should be affirmed. It is therefore ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this Court that the judgment of the Juvenile Court of Stewart County is affirmed, and this cause is remanded to the Juvenile Court of Stewart County for collection of the costs below. Costs on appeal are taxed against the Appellants, Joshua H. and Amie H., and their surety, if any. PER CURIAM

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.