Mamakeh Mamadi Jawara v. Latoya Michelle Jawara
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: This is an appeal from a divorce decree entered on August 5, 2008. Because the appellant voluntarily dismissed her first appeal from the same divorce decree in 2008, and did not file her current notice of appeal with the trial court clerk within the time permitted by Tenn. R. App. P. 4, we dismiss the appeal.
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned October 31, 2011 MAMAKEH MAMADI JAWARA v. LATOYA MICHELLE JAWARA Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 07D2598 Carol Soloman, Judge No. M2011-02256-COA-R3-CV - Filed October 31, 2011 This is an appeal from a divorce decree entered on August 5, 2008. Because the appellant voluntarily dismissed her first appeal from the same divorce decree in 2008, and did not file her current notice of appeal with the trial court clerk within the time permitted by Tenn. R. App. P. 4, we dismiss the appeal. Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed F RANK G. C LEMENT, J R., J., A NDY D. B ENNETT, J., and R ICHARD H. D INKINS, J. LaToya Michelle Jawara, Nashville, Tennessee, Pro Se. Mamakeh Mamadi Jawara, Antioch, Tennessee, Pro Se. ______________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 The trial court entered a final decree of divorce on August 5, 2008. The wife, LaToya Michelle Jawara, filed a timely notice of appeal to this court. However, on September 4, 2008, Ms. Jawara filed a motion for voluntary dismissal of her appeal pursuant to Tenn. R. 1 Tenn. R. Ct. App. 10 states: This Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When a case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall be designated MEMORANDUM OPINION, shall not be published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in any unrelated case. App. P. 15. The court dismissed the appeal on September 16, 2008. In 2011, Ms. Jawara contacted the clerk of this court about reopening her appeal. She was informed that the appeal was over and could not be reopened. Not satisfied with the clerk s response, on October 11, 2011, Ms. Jawara filed with the trial court clerk a second notice of appeal from the August 5, 2008 order. The trial court clerk transmitted the notice to this court in accordance with Tenn. R. App. P. 5, and the clerk assigned the notice of appeal a new appeal number. On October 24, 2011, this court ordered Ms. Jawara to show cause why this new appeal should not be dismissed. Ms. Jawara has filed a response which sets forth her position regarding the underlying divorce action, but fails to show good cause why the appeal should not be dismissed. Ms. Jawara s first appeal was dismissed, at her request, on September 16, 2008. No petition to rehear or Tenn. R. App. P. 11 application was filed, and the time for such filings has long since expired. The first appeal is over and cannot be reopened. The notice of appeal filed on October 11, 2011 was untimely. Tenn. R. App. P. 4. Moreover, a party cannot file a new appeal from a judgment which has already been appealed and the appeal dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the trial court s August 5, 2008 judgment has become final and cannot be appealed. The appeal is hereby dismissed. The costs are taxed to LaToya Michelle Jawara for which execution, if necessary, may issue. PER CURIAM -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
