State v. Whistler
Annotate this CaseDefendant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and ingestion of a substance for the purpose of becoming intoxicated. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding (1) a plain reading of the statutes under which Defendant was convicted reveals that nothing precludes a conviction of unauthorized possession when the controlled substance is ingested and thereby absorbed into the human body; (2) Defendant did not face double jeopardy by being convicted of both possession of a controlled substance, by way of an altered state of cocaine absorbed into the body, and ingestion of a substance other than alcohol for purposes of becoming intoxicated; (3) there was sufficient evidence to prove venue; and (4) the circuit court did not err in instructing the jury.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.