State v. Sidney Moorer

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court The State, Respondent, v. Sidney Moorer, Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2020-001434 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal from Horry County R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 2022-MO-006 Heard May 17, 2022 – Filed May 25, 2022 CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, and Solicitor Jimmy Richardson II, of Conway, all for Respondent. PER CURIAM: We granted certiorari to review whether the court of appeals erred in affirming the circuit court's denial of Petitioner's motion for directed verdict on the charge of obstruction of justice. State v. Sidney Moorer, Op. No. 2020-UP-198 (S.C. Ct. App. filed July 1, 2020). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.