MO-047 - Pavilion Development v. Nexsen Pruet
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Pavilion Development Corp. & Larry McNair, Appellants, v. Nexsen Pruet, LLC, Defendant, v. DC & Sons, LLC, Counterclaim Defendant, Of Which Nexsen Pruet, LLC is the Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2013-002796 Appeal from Charleston County J. C. Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 2015-MO-047 Heard May 6, 2015 – Filed August 12, 2015 AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED Andrew K. Epting, Jr. and Michelle N. Endemann, both of Andrew K. Epting, Jr., LLC, of Charleston; George J. Kefalos and Oana D. Johnson, both of George J. Kefalos, PA, of Charleston, for Appellants. Elizabeth Van Doren Gray, Tina Cundari, and Benjamin R. Gooding, all of Sowell Gray Stepp & Laffitte, LLC, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: We affirm the trial court's grant of summary judgment. See Skipper v. ACE Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., Op. No. 27547 (S.C. Sup. Ct. filed July 15, 2015). ("[I]n South Carolina, the assignment of a legal malpractice claim between adversaries in litigation in which the alleged malpractice arose is prohibited."). However, we modify the dismissal to be without prejudice. AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED. TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
