Powell v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Julius Powell, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2010-154527 Appeal From Lexington County R. Lawton McIntosh, Post-Conviction Relief Judge L. Casey Manning, Plea Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-MO-035 Submitted September 5, 2012 Filed September 12, 2012 AFFIRMED Tricia A. Blanchette, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from the denial of his application for post-conviction relief (PCR). Because there is sufficient evidence to support the PCR judge's finding that petitioner did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to a direct appeal, we grant certiorari as to petitioner's Question I, dispense with further briefing, and proceed with a review of the direct appeal issue pursuant to Davis v. State, 288 S.C. 290, 342 S.E.2d 60 (1986). The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied as to petitioner's Question II. Petitioner's convictions and sentences are affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. McKinney, 278 S.C. 107, 292 S.E.2d 598 (1982) (failure to object at the plea proceeding that the guilty plea is not knowing and voluntary precludes consideration of the issue on appeal). AFFIRMED. TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
