State v. Pride
Annotate this CaseTHIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
The State, Respondent,
v.
Christopher Lee Pride, Petitioner.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal From Union County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2009-MO-064
Heard December 1, 2009 Filed December
14, 2009
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Acting Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, of Columbia, and Fletcher Smith, Jr., of Greenville, for Petitioner.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Senior Assistant Attorney General Harold M. Coombs, Jr., of Columbia, and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' opinion in State v. Pride, Op. No. 2007-UP-544 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Dec. 5, 2007). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
TOAL, C.J., WALLER, PLEICONES, KITTREDGE, JJ., and Acting Justice James E. Moore, concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.