Smith v. Hastie
Annotate this CaseTHE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
Berrien W. Smith, Respondent,
v.
J. Drayton Hastie, Jr., and Everett L. Smith, Jr., Defendants,
of whom J. Drayton Hastie, Jr. is Petitioner.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal From Charleston County
Thomas L. Hughston, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Opinion No. 26545
Heard June 24, 2008 – Re-filed September
8, 2008
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Richard S. Rosen, of Rosen, Rosen and Hagood, of Charleston, for Petitioner.
Thomas A. Pendarvis, of Beaufort, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review
the Court of Appeals’ opinion in Smith v. Hastie, 367 S.C. 410, 626 S.E.2d 13 (Ct. App. 2005). We dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, PLEICONES, JJ., and Acting Justice Howard P. King, concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.