Morris v. State

Annotate this Case
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court

Anthony Lamont Morris, Petitioner,

v.

State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appeal from Greenville County
Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Memorandum Opinion No. 2008-MO-013
Submitted January 23, 2008 Filed March 10, 2008  

AFFIRMED

Joenathan S. Chaplin, of Columbia, for petitioner.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Karen C. Ratigan, of Columbia, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR,  and the following authority:  Harden v. State, 360 S.C. 405, 602 S.E.2d 48 (2004) (petitioner bears the burden of proving both attorney error and prejudice); Bruno v. State, 347 S.C. 446, 556 S.E.2d 393 (2001) (upholding denial of relief where finding of no prejudice is supported by the record).

TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, PLEICONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.