Svetlik Construction Co. v. Zimmerman
Annotate this CaseTHIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
Svetlik Construction Co., Inc., Plaintiff,
v.
Karen Zimmerman, Petitioner,
v.
Michael Svetlik, Sumter National Bank, County of Sumter and City of Sumter, Third Party Defendants,
of whom County of Sumter and City of Sumter are Respondents.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal From Sumter County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2005-MO-023
Heard May 18, 2005 Filed June 6, 2005
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Melvin L. Roberts, of York, for Petitioner.
Harold C. Wilson, John E. James, III, and David C. Holler, all of Lee, Erter, Wilson, James, Holler & Smith, L.L.C., of Sumter, for Respondents.
PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the decision in Svetlik Constr. Co. v. Zimmerman, Op. No. 2003-UP-735 (S.C. Ct. App. filed December 16, 2003). We dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
MOORE, A.C.J., WALLER, BURNETT, PLEICONES, JJ., and Acting Justice James W. Johnson, Jr., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.