Gomes v. APAC-Georgia, Inc
Annotate this CaseTHIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
Jodi Gomes, Respondent,
v.
APAC-Georgia, Inc. and South Carolina Department of Transportation, Defendants,
of whom APAC-Georgia, Inc. is the Appellant.
Appeal From Aiken County
Rodney A. Peeples, Circuit
Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No.
2004-MO-065
Submitted October 26, 2004
Filed November 15, 2004
AFFIRMED
Robert L. Widener, Celeste T. Jones, and A. Victor Rawl, Jr., all of the McNair Law Firm, P.A., of Columbia; and Peter P. Murnaghan, of Murnaghan & Ferguson, P.A., of Tampa, Florida, for Appellant.
Terry E. Richardson, Jr., and Daniel S. Haltiwanger, both of Richardson, Patrick, Westbrook, & Brickman, L.L.C., of Barnwell, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: Dorrell v. S.C. Dep't of Transp., Op. No. 25875 (S.C. Sup. Ct. filed September 27, 2004) (Shearouse Adv. Sh. No. 37 at 25).
AFFIRMED.
TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.