Henry v. Harris

Annotate this Case

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court

James R. Henry,        Appellant,

v.

Natasha R. Harris,        Respondent.

Appeal From Greenville County
Henry F. Floyd, Circuit Court Judge
Joseph J. Watson, Circuit Court Judge
G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Larry R. Patterson, Circuit Court Judge

Memorandum Opinion No. 2004-MO-047
Heard October 22, 2003 - Filed August 23, 2004

AFFIRMED

Samuel Darryl Harms, of Harms Law Firm, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Robert D. Moseley, Jr. and Paul E. Hammack, both of Leatherwood, Walker, Todd & Mann, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: Dunn v. Dunn, 298 S.C. 499, 381 S.E.2d 734 (1989); Otis Elevator, Inc. v. Hardin Constr. Co. Group, Inc., 316 S.C. 292, 450 S.E.2d 41 (1994).

MOORE, A.C.J., WALLER, BURNETT, PLEICONES, JJ., and Acting Justice James W. Johnson, Jr., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.