In the Matter of Estate of Herbert Franklin Dickson, Jr.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals In the Matter of Estate of Herbert Franklin Dickson, Sr. Milton Oakley Dickson, Appellant, v. Arthur B. Beasley, Jr., as Personal Representative of the Estate of Herbert F. Dickson, Sr., Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2020-000782 Appeal From Sumter County Dale Atkinson, Probate Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-455 Submitted October 1, 2022 – Filed December 14, 2022 APPEAL DISMISSED S. Jahue Moore and John Calvin Bradley, Jr., both of Moore Bradley Myers, PA, of West Columbia, for Appellant. J Cabot Seth, of Jones Seth & Jones, LLP, and Kenneth R. Young, Jr., both of Sumter, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Milton Oakley Dickson (Milton) appeals the probate court's order distributing assets and residuary of the estate of Herbert Franklin Dickson, Sr. (the Estate). On appeal, Milton argues (1) the probate court applied the incorrect burden of proof; (2) Arthur B. Beasley, Jr.'s claims against the Estate should be disallowed and he should be removed as personal representative for breaching his fiduciary duties; and (3) this court may substitute its findings for the probate court. We dismiss this appeal. Because Milton failed to file an appeal with the circuit court prior to appealing to this court, we dismiss this appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction. See Dorn v. Cohen, 421 S.C. 517, 520, 809 S.E.2d 53, 54 (2017) ("Appeals from the probate court are governed by section 62-1-308 of the Probate Code . . . ."); S.C. Code Ann. § 62-1-308 (2022) ("[A]ppeals from the probate court must be to the circuit court and are governed by the following rules . . . .") (emphasis added); State v. Brown, 358 S.C. 382, 387, 596 S.E.2d 39, 41 (2004) ("[T]his [c]ourt has held the failure to comply with procedural requirements for an appeal divests a court of appellate jurisdiction . . . ."); see, e.g., In re Estate of Cretzmeyer, 365 S.C. 12, 13-14, 615 S.E.2d 116, 116-17 (2005) (affirming the circuit court's dismissal of an appeal from the probate court because the appellant failed to comply with the procedural requirements of section 62-1-308). APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 WILLIAMS, C.J., THOMAS, J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur. 1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
