SCDSS v. Donald Chisholm
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Candace Griggs and Donald Chisolm, Defendants, Of whom Donald Chisolm is the Appellant. In the interests of minors under the age of 18. Appellate Case No. 2021-001239 Appeal From Darlington County Cely Anne Brigman, Family Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-272 Submitted June 17, 2022 – Filed June 21, 2022 AFFIRMED Heather Vry Scalzo, of Offit Kurman, of Spartanburg, for Appellant. Christopher Craig Jackson, of Chris Jackson Law Firm LLC, of Mauldin, for Respondent. Stuart Wesley Snow, Jr., of Snow & Bailey Law Firm, P.A., of Florence, for the Guardian ad Litem. PER CURIAM: Donald Chisolm appeals the family court's final order terminating his parental rights to his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2021). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Chisholm's counsel. AFFIRMED.1 WILLIAMS, C.J., and KONDUROS and VINSON, JJ., concur. 1 We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
