SCDSS v. Ja'Quetrice Tanekka Putman

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Ja'Quetrice Tanekka Putman, Brandon Lafredzo Robinson, and Marquies Lamar Cunningham, Defendants, Of whom Ja'Quetrice Tanekka Putman is the Appellant. In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen. Appellate Case No. 2021-001204 Appeal From Laurens County Matthew P. Turner, Family Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-201 Submitted May 12, 2022 – Filed May 13, 2022 AFFIRMED Heather Vry Scalzo, of Byford & Scalzo, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant. Ashley Phillips Case, of Fountain Inn, for Respondent. Marcus Wesley Meetze, of Law Office of Marcus W. Meetze, LLC, of Simpsonville, for the Guardian ad Litem. PER CURIAM: Ja'Quetrice Tanekka Putman appeals the family court's final order terminating parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2021). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Putnam's counsel. AFFIRMED.1 THOMAS, MCDONALD, and HEWITT, JJ., concur. 1 We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.