SCDSS v. Pearson

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Myrtle Amanda Pearson, Appellant. In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen. Appellate Case No. 2021-000101 Appeal From Spartanburg County M. Todd Thigpen, Family Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-228 Submitted June 7, 2021 – Filed June 17, 2021 AFFIRMED Rosalyn Henderson Myers, of Henderson Law Group, of Spartanburg, for Appellant. Deborah Murdock Gentry, of Murdock Law Firm, LLC, of Mauldin, for Respondent. Jamia Diann Foster, of Law Office of Jamia D. Foster LLC, of Spartanburg, as the Guardian ad Litem. PER CURIAM: Myrtle Amanda Pearson appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 6-7-2570 (Supp. 2020). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Pearson's counsel. AFFIRMED.1 LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HEWITT, JJ., concur. 1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.