In the Interest of Matthew K.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals In the Interest of Matthew K., a Juvenile under the age of Seventeen, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-001002 Appeal From Pickens County Tarita A. Dunbar, Family Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-094 Submitted February 1, 2020 – Filed April 8, 2020 APPEAL DISMISSED Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. APPEAL DISMISSED. HUFF, THOMAS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.