UP-191 - State v. Rachels

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Phillip Rachels, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2012-209831 Appeal From Aiken County Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-191 Submitted April 1, 2013 Filed May 15, 2013 APPEAL DISMISSED Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia; and Phillip Rachels, pro se, for Appellant. Tommy Evans, Jr., of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted. APPEAL DISMISSED.1 HUFF, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur. 1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.